cms_WV: 9658
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
|
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
| 9658 |
ANSTED CENTER |
515133 |
106 TYREE STREET OPERATIONS, LLC /P.O DRAWER 400 |
ANSTED |
WV |
25812 |
2011-02-02 |
441 |
D |
0 |
1 |
860Y11 |
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, review of the facility's listing of residents with histories of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to assure Resident #49 was appropriately cohorted with roommates to prevent the potential spread of infection. The facility placed Resident #74 in a four-bed ward with Resident #49, when Resident #74 was receiving treatment for [REDACTED].#74 at risk of contracting a MRSA infection to her open wounds. This deficient practice affected one (1) of twenty-eight (28) residents in the Stage II sample. Resident identifiers: #74. Facility census: 59. Findings include: a) Resident #74 Review of the facility's listing of residents with a history of MRSA infection, on 01/27/11, found Resident #49 had a history of [REDACTED]. Review of Resident #74's medical record found she was receiving treatment for [REDACTED]. Observation of the facility found Resident #74 had been placed in the same room as Resident #49. When this issue was brought to the facility's attention, Resident #49 was moved to a private room. An interview with the director of nursing (DON - Employee #15), on the afternoon of 02/02/11, revealed Resident #49 was moved to a private room for infection control purposes on 01/31/11. |
2015-10-01 |