cms_WV: 8753
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8753 | PINE LODGE | 515001 | 405 STANAFORD ROAD | BECKLEY | WV | 25801 | 2013-03-13 | 203 | D | 1 | 0 | MS9D11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon record review and staff interview the facility failed, before a discharge, to notify the resident and, if known, a family member or legal representative of the resident of the transfer or discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, the reason for transfer or discharge; the effective date of transfer or discharge; the location to which the resident was being transferred or discharged ; a statement the resident had the right to appeal the action to the State; and the name, address and telephone number of the State long term care ombudsman. This was found for two (2) of four (4) residents whose records were reviewed. Facility census: 115 Findings include: a) Resident #116 The medical record of Resident #116 was reviewed on 03/11/13 at 3:40 p.m. Resident #116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on [DATE]. Resident #116 was discharged back to his son's home on 3/10/13. Discharge planning was appropriate, but there was no evidence the health care surrogate (HCS) received any written notice of discharge and applicable appeal rights. This information was specifically requested from administrator on 03/13/13 at 8:45 a.m., but could not be located by the time of exit. b) Resident #117 The medical record of resident #117 was begun on 03/11/3 at 3:00 p.m. and continued on 03/12/13 at 8:59 a.m. Resident #117 was admitted following hospitalization for a fall resulting in a head injury. The hospital discharged him to the facility on [DATE]. He was subsequently discharged to an adult care home on 11/08/12. The administrator, Employee #38, was interviewed on 03/12/13 at 3:47 p.m. She was not able to provide any supporting documentation to show that Resident #117's sister, who the facility considered the legally appointed health care surrogate (HCS), was notified in writing of his discharge and thereby given her appeal rights and contact information. | 2016-03-01 |