cms_WV: 7934

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
7934 ANSTED CENTER 515133 96 TYREE STREET ANSTED WV 25812 2012-12-11 318 D 0 1 K06L11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident interview, resident observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for range of motion during Stage two (2) of the survey, received appropriate treatment to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion. A resident with a contracture did not receive range of motion services. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident #10 A stage one staff interview, on 12/03/12 at 2:53 p.m., revealed Resident #10 had a contracture of the left hand. Additionally, it revealed the resident did not wear a splint, nor receive range of motion services. An observation and interview was completed with Resident #10 on 12/04/12 at 2:18 p.m. Observation revealed a contracture of her left hand. She stated services were not performed to maintain range of motion. The resident stated her contracture was related to a stroke. Review of the medical record, on 12/05/12, revealed a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The minimum data set (MDS) was reviewed on 12/11/12 at 9:00 a.m. The assessment, dated 10/03/12, indicated the resident had an impairment of one (1) of her upper extremities. Section S of the comprehensive assessment, dated 04/02/12, indicated the resident had a contracture of the left hand. Employee #57 (a nursing assistant) was interviewed on 12/11/12 at 10:10 a.m. She stated the resident did not receive therapy or range of motion services for the contracture of her left hand. The resident was interviewed again on 12/11/12 at 10:15 a.m. She was alert, verbal and coherent. She said her hand had been this way since my stroke. She again stated the staff did not provide range of motion, nor encourage her to perform range of motion of her left hand. Employee #35, a registered nurse care plan coordinator (RN CPC) was interviewed on 12/11/12 at 3:00 p.m. She acknowledged the contracture was not addressed on the care plan and no routine preventive treatment was provided to prevent worsening of the contracture. Employee #31, another RN CPC, was also interviewed on 12/11/12 at 3:00 p.m. She stated the MDS identified the contracture of Resident #10's left hand on the April 2012 assessment. She indicated the contracture was not addressed because it did not pull to Section V for care area assessment. Employee #31 agreed the contracture of the the resident's left hand was not addressed in the care plan, nor addressed in the care area assessment. treatment of [REDACTED]. There was no evidence the resident received any services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. 2016-12-01