cms_WV: 7619
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
|
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
| 7619 |
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CENTER |
515100 |
345 POCAHONTAS TRAIL |
WHITE SULPHUR SPRING |
WV |
24986 |
2013-03-13 |
309 |
D |
0 |
1 |
0BYS11 |
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of twenty-nine (29) Stage II sampled residents received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. One (1) resident was not assessed and / or monitored for an elevated [MEDICAL CONDITION] level (TSH); a resident was not provided ordered medications for a skin condition ([MEDICATION NAME]); and a resident's admission nursing assessment was not completed for a deep tissue injury. Resident identifiers: #88 and #1. Facility census: 65. Findings include: a) Resident #88 Review of the medical record found a laboratory test obtained on 02/05/13 for a [MEDICAL CONDITION] level (TSH). The physician signed and documented on the form on 02/07/13, . (an arrow pointing downward - which indicated reduce) [MEDICATION NAME]. Review of the documentation related to the [MEDICAL CONDITION] level found no evidence of the resident's medication ([MEDICATION NAME]) being reduced. An interview with Employee #65, the director of nursing (DON), on 03/12/13 at 11:15 a.m., confirmed the resident continued on the same dose of [MEDICATION NAME] and the physician had in fact written on the laboratory form to decrease the [MEDICATION NAME]. b) Resident #1 Medical records, reviewed on 03/07/13 at 10:00, found a physician order [REDACTED]. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) flow sheet and shower schedule found the resident received showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Review of Treatment Administration Records (TAR) found licensed nurses had signed and documented the [MEDICATION NAME] treatments on Mondays and Tuesday. An interview, on 03/07/13 with Employee #65 (DON), confirmed Resident #1's shower days were Wednesdays and Saturdays and the [MEDICATION NAME] treatments had not been received. The physician orders [REDACTED]. |
2017-03-01 |