cms_WV: 5100

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
5100 RALEIGH CENTER 515088 1631 RITTER DRIVE DANIELS WV 25832 2015-04-10 154 D 0 1 CRGX11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for resident rights was informed of his health status and needs. The resident's daughter, and not the resident, who had capacity to make health care decisions, was informed of the resident's health status. Resident identifier: #76. Facility census: 66. Findings include: a) Resident #76 On 04/06/15 at 11:04 a.m., the resident voiced concerns that staff did not involve him in his plan of care. He stated, I want my daughter involved and notified; however, I want to be notified first. Medical record review, on 04/06/15 at 1:20 p.m., found Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. On 11/29/14, Resident #76's attending physician determined he had capacity to make informed health care decisions. Review of nurse's notes since admission found Resident #76's daughter was notified of his condition instead of the resident. An interview with Employee #42, Director of Admissions (DOA) and Employee #59, Social Services (SS), on 04/08/15 at 1:15 p.m., confirmed Resident #76 should be notified and involved in his plan of care. On 04/08/15 at 2:00 p.m., after intervention during the survey, Employee #42 spoke with Resident #76. The resident voiced his concern of not being allowed to be involved in his plan of care. In-service documentation, provided on 04/08/15, confirmed Resident #76 had capacity to make health care decisions and wished to actively participate in his care process. 2019-03-01