cms_WV: 11337
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
| rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11337 | MAPLESHIRE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER | 515058 | 30 MON GENERAL DRIVE | MORGANTOWN | WV | 26505 | 2011-01-11 | 311 | E | CVPG11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** . Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a continuity of restorative nursing services as ordered by the physician to maintain and/or increase self-performance of transfer / ambulation and/or eating activities. Twenty-four (24) residents had physician orders [REDACTED]. Resident identifiers: #2, #5, #7, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #21, #23, #24, #33, #41, #48, #52, #53, #57, #61, #62, #68, #70, #74, #76, and #77. Facility census: 76. Findings include: a) Residents #2, #5, #7, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #21, #23, #24, #33, #41, #48, #52, #53, #57, #61, #62, #68, #70, #74, #76, and #77 On 01/10/11, a review of the facility's "Restorative Nursing and Progress Summary" for the months of January 2011 and December 2010 was completed to determine whether residents were receiving restorative nursing services at the frequency ordered by their attending physician Month-to-date in January 2011, fourteen (14) residents did not receive restorative nursing services for transfer / ambulation or activities to improve eating on five (5) of ten (10) days. These were Residents #2, #5, #7, #12, #15, #24, #33, #41, #52, #57, #61, #68, #74, and #76. During the month of December 2010, thirty-six (36) residents did not receive restorative nursing services for transfer / ambulation or activities to improve eating on anywhere between three (3) and eight (8) days of this month. These were Residents #2, #5, #7, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #21, #23, #24, #33, #41, #48, #52, #53, #57, #61, #62, #68, #70, #74, #76, and #77. Each resident had a physician orders [REDACTED]. Restorative nursing services were ordered for seven (7) days a week with two (2) restorative aides providing the restorative services. A licensed practical nurse (LPN) was currently in charge of the program, and a registered professional nurse (RN) had been hired to assume the supervision of the restorative nursing program. An interview with a restorative aide (Employee #60), on 01/10/11 at 10:30 a.m., revealed the restorative aide was assigned to drive the facility van to take residents to appointments. On this date of 01/10/11, she was scheduled to leave the facility to transport residents to four (4) appointments. She further stated, "I am a van driver." An interview with another restorative aide (Employee #63), on 01/11/11 at 11:30 a.m., revealed that any areas on the facility's "Restorative Nursing and Progress Summary" marked with an "X" indicated that the restorative services was not provided for the resident. She further stated that the restorative aides were pulled to the floor for direct care services when there were call-offs, and this occurred frequently. When they were pulled to the floor to provide direct care for the residents, the restorative services were not provided for those residents requiring the services. An interview with the administrator, on 01/11/10 at 1:00 p.m., revealed they had made changes to the restorative nursing program to address the issue of residents not receiving services when the restorative aides were pulled to drive the van or work on the floor. . | 2014-04-01 |