cms_WV: 10084

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid	facility_name	facility_id	address	city	state	zip	inspection_date	deficiency_tag	scope_severity	complaint	standard	eventid	inspection_text	filedate
10084	ARBORS AT FAIRMONT	515189	130 KAUFMAN DRIVE	FAIRMONT	WV	26554	2010-03-04	161	E	0	1	FFCS11	. Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain a current surety bond to protect all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents who elected to have their funds managed by the facility. Facility census: 112. Findings include: a) Shortly after entrance to the facility, facility staff provided requested information regarding the surety bond. Review of the surety bond revealed an accompanying letter from the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC - the State agency designated to serve as the holder of such bonds for nursing homes in WV) dated 01/11/10, relaying a request from the Attorney General's Office to make necessary corrections and return the surety bond to the OHFLAC. Furthermore, the letter instructed the facility to contact the Attorney General's Office for any further questions regarding the corrections. Interview with the business office director (Employee #3), on 03/04/10 at 9:30 a.m., revealed the surety bond was signed by the representative authorized by the corporation to do so, although he was neither the president or vice-president of the corporation nor owner or general partner of the company as specified by the Attorney General's office. She said the corporate office takes care of this, not the facility, and they were in the process of trying to clarify this. On 03/04/10 at 10:15 a.m., a representative from OHFLAC, when interviewed, reported that, as of this date, the facility's surety bond covering the period of 08/15/09 through 08/15/10 had not been approved by the Attorney General's Office. .	2015-07-01