cms_WV: 10074

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
10074 OAK RIDGE CENTER 515174 1000 ASSOCIATION DRIVE CHARLESTON WV 25311 2012-03-01 225 D 1 0 0TSC11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** . Based on facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of neglect were reported to state agencies as required, and were thoroughly investigated. This deficient practice affected one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents. The resident's daughter made an allegation of neglect which was not investigated or reported by the facility. Resident identifier: #73. Facility census: 71. Findings include: a) Resident #73 Review of a facility document, dated 02/13/12, entitled "Record of Customer and Family Concerns," found the social worker, Employee #79, contacted the resident's daughter after the resident's admission to the hospital on [DATE]. Employee #79 documented the daughter "had some concerns about resident's condition prior to admission to hospital (sic)". Employee #79 further documented the nursing home administrator and director of nursing were informed. Employee #79 documented the daughter reported Resident #73 had bilateral pneumonia. Employee #79 further documented the daughter was upset with the facility "...because we did not check on her often because if we did this wouldn't have happened." Employee #79 documented the daughter stated, "...she came in on Wed. 01/31/12 and her mother appeared dehydrated, (her mouth was dry and tongue sticking to roof of mouth). (The Daughter) notified a nurse (couldn't recall name or identify), however nurse shrugged it off. (The daughter) gave her mother water and she seemed better. Monday 2/6/12, (the daughter) came to see (Resident #73) again (around end of dinner) and found her shaking and appearing dehydrated. (The daughter) also reports that her tube feed was dated for 2/4/12 and crusted around opening at stomach. (The daughter) reports that her mother was not talking or acknowledging her presence. (The daughter) went to get a nurse, but felt the nurse shrugged it off and ignored her concerns. (The daughter) continued to express concerns to nurse. (The daughter) said nurse told her she was shaking due to [MEDICAL CONDITION] Dx (diagnosis). (The daughter) told nurse she did not have [MEDICAL CONDITION]. Nurse took vitals and agreed to contact physician. (The daughter) stated she insisted that facility send her mother out. When (Resident #73) arrived @ (at) the hospital, (The Daughter) reports, the physician told her to call in family because (Resident #73) was almost dead. (The Daughter) reports that ER (emergency) physicians cautioned her against sending her back to (the facility)...". An interview with Employee #79, on 02/28/12 at 4:30 p.m., revealed the facility had not investigated nor reported the allegations of neglect made by Resident #73's daughter. . 2015-07-01