cms_VT: 33
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
33 | BURLINGTON HEALTH & REHAB | 475014 | 300 PEARL STREET | BURLINGTON | VT | 5401 | 2019-05-01 | 623 | D | 1 | 0 | IOQ211 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** > Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed prior to discharge to notify 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1) in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility also failed to send a copy of any notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings include: Per interview 4/29/19 at 2:20 PM, the Admissions Director stated that s/he did not provide a transfer/discharge notice with appeal rights and required contact information to Resident #1 on 4/24/19, nor did s/he mail the notice to Resident #1 or the representative. The facility alleged that this was a resident initiated AMA (against medical advice) discharge on 4/24/19. This was confirmed by the administrator and Director of Nursing (DNS) on 4/30/19 at 9:00 AM, based on the signature of Resident #1 on an AMA document, signed at 1:00 PM on 4/24/19, and verbal expression of desire to leave the facility during an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting just prior (per Social Services notes of 4/24/19 and interview on 4/29/19 at 12:30 PM). Per interview on 4/29/19 at 2:15 PM, the Recreation Assistant (who attended the IDT meeting of 4/24/19) reported that Resident #1 simply wanted to go downtown that day. Based on the behavior of Resident #1, returning to the facility twice on the afternoon of 4/24/19 and verbalizing that s/he made a mistake, this could also be viewed as a therapeutic leave on the part of the resident, and an unsafe decision related to potential cognitive changes caused by brewing bacterial urinary tract infection [MEDICAL CONDITIONS]. There is no evidence that Resident #1 initiated the AMA discharge process. Refer to F622. | 2020-09-01 |