cms_SC: 9585
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9585 | KINGSTREE NURSING FACILITY | 425117 | 401 NELSON BOULEVARD | KINGSTREE | SC | 29556 | 2010-10-13 | 502 | D | 0 | 1 | M1ZN11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On the days of the survey, based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that laboratory test results were available for clinical management in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents receiving [MEDICATION NAME] (Resident #2). The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #2 on 7/11/07 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the medical record on 10/11/10 revealed Resident #2 received [MEDICATION NAME] 125 mg/5cc (miligrams/cubic centimeters) every 8 hours. Further record review indicated the current cumulative physician's orders [REDACTED]. LPN #1 was asked to review the laboratory results section of the medical record and confirmed that the May 2010 [MEDICATION NAME] Level was not on the record. When asked about the procedure for tracking when labs are due, LPN #1 stated that the Unit Manager posts a list of due/draw dates at each unit. During an interview on 10/13/10 at approximately 11:00 AM, RN #1 stated that the Unit Manager maintains a log for each resident that indicates when labs are due. RN #1 stated that lab results are faxed to the facility, sorted by the Unit Managers, and filed in the medical records after the physician signs the test results. RN #1 stated that when lab results are received, he/she documents the log with the date the lab was drawn. Review of the laboratory log for Resident #1 revealed the space to document the May 2010 [MEDICATION NAME] Level was blank. | 2015-03-01 |