cms_SC: 9381

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
9381 AGAPE REHABILITATION OF ROCK HILL 425159 159 SEDGEWOOD DR ROCK HILL SC 29732 2011-07-26 333 D 0 1 HRMY11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On the days of the survey, based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free from significant medication errors. Resident #3, one of fourteen residents reviewed for medications, did not receive [MEDICATION NAME] as ordered. The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #3 on 6/13/11 and readmitted him on 7/15/11 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Record review on 7/25/11 revealed cumulative physician's orders [REDACTED]. One entry revealed an order for [REDACTED]. The medication had been scheduled for 9:00 AM only. Review of Physician's Telephone Orders revealed an order dated 7/15/11 which said to "Hold [MEDICATION NAME] 20 mg". A subsequent Telephone Order dated 7/20/11 stated "PT (Patient) may start [MEDICATION NAME]". Review of the July 2011 Medication Record revealed an entry for "[MEDICATION NAME] 20 mg (1) PO Q 8 hrs, On hold per Pharmacy". The medication had been initialed as having been given once daily at 9:00 AM on 7/20, 7/21, 7/22, and 7/25 instead of every 8 hours as ordered. On 7/23 and 7/24, the nurse's initials had been circled for the 9:00 AM dose which indicated the resident had not received any [MEDICATION NAME] for those two days. Documented on the back of the Medication Record were entries for 7/23 and 7/24 which stated "[MEDICATION NAME] on hold, pharmacy". During an interview on 7/25/11 at 6:10 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 verified the above findings after reviewing the cumulative July physician's orders [REDACTED]. When asked what [MEDICATION NAME] was for, she stated that [MEDICATION NAME] was another name for [MEDICATION NAME] and that the resident used this medication to improve his [MEDICAL CONDITION] function. When asked if the medication had been on hold on 7/23 and 7/24, LPN #1 stated it hadn't, and that the medication had been available and in the medication cart at that time to be given. During an interview on 7/26/11 at approximately 2:00 PM, the resident's Physician stated the resident was taking [MEDICATION NAME] for [MEDICAL CONDITION] Hypertension. 2015-05-01