cms_SC: 8282
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8282 | NHC HEALTHCARE - LEXINGTON | 425333 | 2993 SUNSET BLVD | WEST COLUMBIA | SC | 29169 | 2012-04-18 | 323 | D | 0 | 1 | 98F911 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On the days of survey, based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for exit seeking remained free from accident hazards as was possible by not assessing the placement of the Wanderguard and circulation as ordered by the physician for Resident #14. The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #14 on 11-2-11 with a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. During an observation of Resident #14 on 4-16-12 at approximately 5:05 PM, the resident was noted to be wearing a Wanderguard on her right ankle. Record review on 4-16-12 at approximately 5:10 PM, revealed that an elopement assessment had been completed on 1-2-12 and an order had been written on 1-3-12 as follows: Place Wanderguard to right ankle. Check placement every shift. Check circulation to right foot every shift. Upon review of Resident #14's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of April, there were no signatures located by the order on the TAR and no further documentation could be found in the chart indicating that the physicians order for every shift assessments for circulation and Wanderguard placement were being followed. During an interview on 4-17-12 at approximately 10:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated that the staff documented Wanderguard placement and circulation on the TAR's. The LPN reviewed the April TAR for Resident #14 and confirmed that the assessments for placement and circulation, had not been initiated as having been completed as ordered. There was no documented evidence the physician's orders [REDACTED]. | 2016-06-01 |