cms_SC: 6259

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
6259 MAGNOLIA MANOR - GREENVILLE 425090 411 ANSEL ST GREENVILLE SC 29601 2014-06-19 278 D 0 1 336311 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On the days of Recertification Survey, based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess Residents #4 and #6, 2 of 11 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to interview the residents for cognition and mood despite the fact the residents were not coded as rarely or never understood. The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #4 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. On 6/17/14 at 2:01 PM, review of the Annual Minimal Data Set ((MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was coded as usually understands and usually understood in Section B for for Hearing, Speech, and Vision. Section C, Cognitive Patterns, C0100, Should Brief Interview for Mental Status be Conducted, was coded 0 No (resident is rarely/never understood). Section C0600, Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted, was not coded but a Staff Assessment was conducted that coded the resident as severely impaired, rarely/never made decisions. Further review revealed Section D of the MDS for Mood, D0100, Should Resident Mood Interview be Conducted, was also coded 0 No (resident rarely/never understood and a Staff Assessment of Resident Mood was conducted. There was no indication that the facility attempted to interview the resident for cognition of mood indicators. The facility admitted Resident #6 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. On 6/18/14 at 3:00 PM review of the Annual Minimal Data Set ((MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was coded as usually understands and usually understood in Section B for for Hearing, Speech, and Vision. Section C, Cognitive Patterns, C0100, Should Brief Interview for Mental Status be Conducted, was coded 0 No (resident is rarely/never understood). Section C0600, Should the Staff Assessment for Mental Status be Conducted, was not coded but a Staff Assessment was conducted that coded the resident as severely impaired, rarely/never made decisions. Further review revealed Section D of the MDS for Mood, D0100, Should Resident Mood Interview be Conducted, was also coded 0 No (resident rarely/never understood and a Staff Assessment of Resident Mood was conducted. During an interview on 6/18/14 at approximately 9:15 AM, the Social Services Director (SSD) confirmed that s/he did not conduct resident interviews for Resident #4 and #6. The SSD stated that s/he used the information from the monthly nursing summary to code the MDS. The MDS Coordinator, also present during the interview, confirmed an interview should have been attempted and coded accordingly. 2018-04-01