cms_SC: 6
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
| rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | BRUSHY CREEK POST ACUTE | 425004 | 101 COTTAGE CREEK CIRCLE | GREER | SC | 29650 | 2018-03-01 | 659 | D | 0 | 1 | JK8711 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care per the Care Plan for Resident #18, 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for Falls. Resident #18 was care planned for the bed to be in low position and to remove bed controls due to the resident being a high fall risk. Cross refer to F689 The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #21 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident #21 was observed in bed with the bed in normal position (not low) on 2/26/2018 at 10:59 AM, 2/27/2018 at 3:56 PM and 2/28/2018 at 3:06 PM. Record review of the Care Plan on 2/28/2018 at 3:23 PM, revealed a focus area indicating Resident #21 was at risk for fall related injuries. Interventions listed for the focus area were to keep the bed in lowest position and to remove the bed controls when the bed is in lowest position so the resident can't raise bed to a high position. In addition, the Care Plan indicated the resident was a high fall risk. During an observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 on 2/27/2018 at 3:58 PM, Resident #18 was observed in bed with the bed in normal position. In addition, the bed controls were observed on the bed, within reach of the resident. CNA #2 stated that the resident was care planned to have the bed low, but she/he did not like the bed in low position. CNA #2 stated that the resident can become very agitated when the bed is in low position and will crawl out of the bed and then be found on the floor in the room. CNA #2 stated that when the bed is in normal position the resident is calm and content. Upon leaving the room, CNA #2 left the bed in normal position with the bed controls within reach of the resident. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 on 2/28/2017 at 3:06 PM, LPN #5 verbalized fall prevention interventions for Resident #18, including keeping the bed in lowest position. In addition, LPN #5 stated the resident is cognitively intact enough to operate the bed controls and will raise the bed up when it is in low position. LPN #5 stated sometimes we turn the bed controls over so the resident can't raise the bed, but the resident had since figured out how to turn the controls back over and raise the bed. At 3:10 PM on 2/28/2018, Resident #18 was observed in bed with the bed in normal position with the bed controls within the resident's reach. LPN #5 lowered the bed and left the bed controls within reach of the resident upon leaving the room. At 3:16, Resident #18 was observed with the bed back in normal position (with LPN #5 present). Resident #18 had used the bed controls to raise the bed back to normal position. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 on 2/28/2018 at 3:55 PM, RN #1 confirmed the Resident was care planned to have the bed in lowest position and to remove the bed controls when in lowest position. RN #1 stated the resident's bed had been lowered and the bed controls were unplugged. Review of Nurse's Notes, Incident Reports, and the Care Plan revealed that the Interdisciplinary Team had reviewed each fall and reviewed and/or revised the Care Plan. | 2020-09-01 |