cms_SC: 281
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
|
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
| 281 |
MAGNOLIA MANOR - INMAN |
425032 |
63 BLACKSTOCK ROAD |
INMAN |
SC |
29349 |
2018-12-20 |
660 |
E |
0 |
1 |
0G2K11 |
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow-up on a request to discharge for Resident #31 (1 of 1 residents reviewed for discharge planning). The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #31 on 03/19/18 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. During an interview on 12/16/18 at 02:51 PM, Resident #31 voiced that s/he wanted to return to the community and go to her/his son's house to live. Resident #31 also reported that no one had discussed discharge planning with her/him. On 12/19/18 at 01:23 PM, review of the Care Plan Conference Summary dated 07/03/18 revealed the resident was requesting to go to her/his son's home to live and also indicated that Social Services will address resident's concerns with (her/his) son. The Social Services Director (SSD) was present at the care plan conference as evidenced by her/his signature. At 01:31 PM, review of the Social Services Progress Review dated 07/03/18 also indicated the resident wanted to discharge home with her/his son and that the resident felt like s/he was capable of taking care of her/himself while her/his son was at work. Further review of the Social Service Progress Notes revealed no documentation that the SSD followed up with the resident's son related to discharge. During an interview on 12/19/18 at 02:02 PM, Social Services designee #1 stated the SSD that was present at that time was no longer at the facility. At that time, each Social Services designee was responsible for a unit, but stated that now all Social Services designees work with all residents. S/he also confirmed there was no documentation that social services followed up with the resident's son. The current Social Services Director stated s/he was not aware of Resident #31's desire to be discharged to the son's house. |
2020-09-01 |