cms_SC: 10150

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
10150 CAROLINAS HOSP SYS TRANS CARE 425177 121 EAST CEDAR STREET FLORENCE SC 29501 2011-01-19 280 D     988C11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On the days of the survey, based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise a plan of care to ensure care needs were met for 2 of 7 resident care plans reviewed. The care plans for Resident #3 and Resident #4 were not revised and updated after both residents were placed on contact precautions. The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #4 on 12/24/10 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the medical record on 1/18/11 revealed a physician's orders [REDACTED]." Further record review revealed a positive culture screen for [MEDICATION NAME] Resistant [MEDICATION NAME] reported on 1/08/11. Review of the care plan indicated the care plan was last updated on 1/06/11. The care plan was not reviewed and revised to include Contact Precautions as a problem area after the positive culture and physician's orders [REDACTED]. This information was shared with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 1/19/11 at approximately 4:30 PM at which time the MDS Coordinator confirmed the care plan was not revised to include Contact Precautions following the 1/08/11 culture screen. The facility admitted Resident #3 on 12/31/10 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Record review on 1/18/11 revealed that the resident had been placed on Contact Isolation on 1/3/11 and that a care plan for infection/isolation had not been developed. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #2 on 1/18/11 at 6:05 PM revealed that if the [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. An interview with the Care Plan Coordinator on 1/19/11 at 6:30 PM confirmed that a care plan had not been developed to reflect that Resident #3 had been placed on Contact Precautions. 2014-04-01