cms_SC: 10150
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10150 | CAROLINAS HOSP SYS TRANS CARE | 425177 | 121 EAST CEDAR STREET | FLORENCE | SC | 29501 | 2011-01-19 | 280 | D | 988C11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On the days of the survey, based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise a plan of care to ensure care needs were met for 2 of 7 resident care plans reviewed. The care plans for Resident #3 and Resident #4 were not revised and updated after both residents were placed on contact precautions. The findings included: The facility admitted Resident #4 on 12/24/10 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the medical record on 1/18/11 revealed a physician's orders [REDACTED]." Further record review revealed a positive culture screen for [MEDICATION NAME] Resistant [MEDICATION NAME] reported on 1/08/11. Review of the care plan indicated the care plan was last updated on 1/06/11. The care plan was not reviewed and revised to include Contact Precautions as a problem area after the positive culture and physician's orders [REDACTED]. This information was shared with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 1/19/11 at approximately 4:30 PM at which time the MDS Coordinator confirmed the care plan was not revised to include Contact Precautions following the 1/08/11 culture screen. The facility admitted Resident #3 on 12/31/10 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Record review on 1/18/11 revealed that the resident had been placed on Contact Isolation on 1/3/11 and that a care plan for infection/isolation had not been developed. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #2 on 1/18/11 at 6:05 PM revealed that if the [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. An interview with the Care Plan Coordinator on 1/19/11 at 6:30 PM confirmed that a care plan had not been developed to reflect that Resident #3 had been placed on Contact Precautions. | 2014-04-01 |