cms_NV: 72
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
72 |
LAS VEGAS POST ACUTE & REHABILITATION |
295006 |
2832 S. MARYLAND PARKWAY |
LAS VEGAS |
NV |
89109 |
2018-03-22 |
623 |
C |
1 |
0 |
5VNN11 |
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** > Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide the Ombudsman the required notice of discharge within the required period of time for two of five sampled residents (Resident #3 and #4). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The resident was discharged to home on 03/08/18. A Discharge Notification Form with no date, documented the resident's planned discharge date was 03/08/18. The Discharge Notice with no date and signed by the resident, documented the resident would be discharged from the facility effective 30 days after the date of this notice, on 02/27/18. The resident would be discharged to home with family as the resident's health has improved sufficiently and would no longer need the services provided by the facility. The discharge notice was sent by the Assistant Administrator to the Ombudsman via electronic mail on 03/08/18, the same day the resident was discharged from the facility. Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The resident was discharged to home on 03/02/18. A Discharge Notification Form with no date, documented the resident's planned discharge date was 03/02/18. A Discharge Notice with no date and signed by the resident, documented the resident would be discharged from the facility effective 30 days after the date of this notice, on 02/27/18. The resident would be discharged to home with family as the resident's health has improved sufficiently and would no longer need the services provided by the facility. The discharge notice was sent by the Administrator to the Ombudsman via electronic mail on 03/05/18, three days after the resident was discharged from the facility. On 03/15/18 at 1:36 PM, the Social Worker revealed not understanding the new regulations on notification of the Ombudsman for transfers and discharge. The Social Worker indicated not understanding how to differentiate between facility-initiated transfer/discharge and resident-initiated transfer/discharge and when the Ombudsman was needed to be notified. On 03/15/18 at 1:57 PM, the Administrator confirmed the notice did not have a date when it was provided to the resident and acknowledged the Ombudsman was not provided with the discharge notices in the required period of time. The facility policy Transfer or Discharge revised 12/2012, documented a resident and/or the resident's representative would be given a thirty-day advance notice of an impending transfer or discharge from the facility. Complaint #NV 927 |
2020-09-01 |