cms_NH: 60
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
|
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
| 60 |
HAVENWOOD-HERITAGE HEIGHTS |
305016 |
33 CHRISTIAN AVENUE |
CONCORD |
NH |
3301 |
2017-09-22 |
279 |
D |
0 |
1 |
NEVL11 |
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 residents out of a sample size of 18 residents. (Resident Identifiers are #3 and #9.) Findings include: Resident #9 Review on 9/21/17 of Resident #9's medical record in the nursing note dated 6/15/17 02:28 p.m. revealed that Resident #9 had a pacemaker. Review on 9/21/17 of Resident #9's care plans revealed that there was not a care plan for the pacemaker. Interview on 9/21/17 at approximately 2:00 p.m. with Staff A (Registered Nurse) confirmed that there was not a care plan for Resident #9's pacemaker. Resident #7 Review on 9/18/17 of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan indicates Resident #7 is receiving a regular diet. Interview on 9/22/17 with Staff H (Registered Dietician) revealed that Resident #7 since 8/28/17 Resident #7 has been receiving a mechanical soft diet with ground meat. The Facility failed to ensure that Resident #7's comprehensive care plan reflected the actual diet Resident #7 was receiving. Resident #3 Review on 9/21/17 of Resident #3's [DIAGNOSES REDACTED].#3 had a pacemaker in place. Review on 9/21/17 of Resident #3's current Care Plan, dated 7/13/17, revealed that there was no care plan for Resident #3's use of a pacemaker. Interview on 9/22/17 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Staff [NAME] (Registered Nurse) confirmed that Resident #3 had a pacemaker and that there was no care plan in place for the pacemaker. |
2020-09-01 |