cms_NE: 948

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
948 ARBOR CARE CENTERS-FRANKLIN LLC 285096 1006 M STREET FRANKLIN NE 68939 2019-10-16 700 D 1 1 DGFB11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** > LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.18B Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to assess Resident 11 and Resident 21 for the use of bed rails. This affected 2 of 2 sampled residents. The facility census at the time of the survey was 21. Findings are: [NAME] Observation of Resident 11's bed on 10/9/19 at 10:51 AM revealed a bed rail in the raised position with a 13.5 gap between the head of the bed and the rail. There was greater than a 4 gap between the mattress and the bed rail. A closed fist could be placed between the mattress and the rail. An interview on 10/9/19 at 11:20 AM with the ADM (Administrator) revealed that the bed in the room to the right should have been appropriate for Resident 11 just in case Resident 11 wanted to lay in the bed. 10/09/19 11:51 AM Interview with RN-A (Registered Nurse) revealed that the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the right side of the room had a space between the mattress and the bed rail of greater than 4. Review of the Side Rail Assessment for Resident 11 revealed the only assessment completed was dated 10/9/19. B. Observation of Resident 21's bed on 10/9/19 at 10:59 AM revealed a side rail on the exit side of the bed with no cover over the rail and a 7 gap in the rail. A head could easily fit into this space. 10/09/19 11:51 AM Interview with RN-A (Registered Nurse) revealed that the side rail in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the exit side of the bed had a space that Resident 21 could have put Resident 21's head through the opening. An interview on 10/09/19 at 11:55 AM with the MS (Maintenance Supervisor) revealed that the side rail did not belong to the facility. The maintenance man was informed by RN- A (Registered Nurse) that the rail needed to be remove immediately. The MS then slid the rail off of the bed which had been attached to a wooden board and place under the mattress. Review of the Side Rail Assessment for Resident 21 revealed the only assessment completed was dated 10/9/19. Review of the policy Proper Use of Side Rails revealed: This facility prohibits the use of side rails as a restraint. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Side rails are considered a restraint when they limit the resident's freedom of movement depending upon the individual's condition and circumstances. 2. An assessment of the resident' symptoms and the reason for using side rails will be conducted prior to use, including their mental status and reason for use of the side rails, and will be documented in the residents' record. 3. The physician will also review and order side rails usage as he deems necessary. 4. Side rails may only be used in order to assist in mobility and transfer of residents. 5. If the resident is using the side rail for positioning, turning and getting out of bed assistance it is not considered a restraint. 6. The use of side rails as an assistive device will be will be addressed in the residents' care plan. 2020-09-01