cms_NE: 12680

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
12680 GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - SCHUYLER 285110 2023 COLFAX STREET SCHUYLER NE 68661 2010-07-12 242 E     L8LX11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number: 175 NAC 12-006.05 (4) Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to honor food preferences for eight residents (Residents 1, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19) and failed to honor preferred seating arrangements in the dining room for five residents (Residents 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18). Sample size was 13 plus 8 non sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 11's undated record of admission revealed that Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observation of the noon meal on 7/6/10 revealed that Resident 11 was served a plate with spinach. Resident 11 was overheard saying," I don't like spinach. I have told them that. I can't even stand to smell it." Interview with Resident 11 on 7/12/10 at 11:30 AM revealed, "I have told them (facility staff) repeatedly since I got here that I can't stand the smell of spinach but they keep serving it to me." Interview with the RD on 7/12/10 at 11:45 AM revealed that all food preferences are to be entered into the computer system and will then appear on the dietary cards as indicated. When requesting a list of preferences for Resident 11 the RD revealed that spinach was not listed on the system as a dislike for Resident 11 but that the RD would enter it now. When asked if the RD was previously aware that Resident 11 did not like spinach the RD replied, "yes". B) Review of the Resident Council minutes of June 1st, 2010 revealed a note which had been added to the minutes which read: " Had a short meeting with most of the residents on June 28th, 2010 after golden stretchers, about all the tables with assisted eating residents were moved by the windows and the residents by the windows moved by the kitchen. The reason was : to let the air conditioning on high until serving meal, then on low during the meal, but turned back up when the assisted eating residents are done eating and taken out of the dining room." This addition to the minutes was signed by the Activity Director and Resident 19. During the Resident Group Interview on 7/8/10 at 10:30 AM Residents 14,15,16, 17 and 18 indicated dissatisfaction at being moved to other tables in the dining room. The residents stated their understanding was that they either had to move or have the air conditioning on. During the status meeting on 7/12/10 at 3:05 the Director of Nursing confirmed that Residents 14,15,16,17, and 18 had been asked to move from the window seats to other tables or leave the air conditioning on. During the group meeting on 7/08/10 at 10:35 AM when residents were asked to comment on the dietary services residents indicated that they are served items that they have repeatedly told the staff they do not like. When asked how many of those present had this problem 8 of 8 residents, as listed above, indicated this was an ongoing problem. 2014-04-01