cms_MS: 42

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
42 BOYINGTON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION 255092 1530 BROAD AVE GULFPORT MS 39501 2017-01-13 278 E 0 1 QXQE11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum data Set (MDS) for two (2) of 23 MDS's reviewed. Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Assessment Coordinator, dated (MONTH) 2001, revealed that each individual who completes a portion of the MDS assessment must certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. Resident #1 A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of (MONTH) 11, (YEAR), revealed under section H0100A, Resident #1 was coded as having an indwelling catheter, and Section H revealed Resident #1 as being occasionally incontinent of bladder. A review of the cumulative physician orders [REDACTED]. A review of the monthly Nursing Summary dated for (MONTH) 10, (YEAR) revealed Resident #1 was assessed, and required the use of an indwelling catheter related to a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED].#1. A staff interview on 01/13/2017 at 10:30 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, revealed it was confirmed the quarterly MDS with the ARD of 11/11/2016 was coded correctly under Section 0H0100A indicating an indwelling catheter, and coded incorrectly under Section 0H indicating the resident was occasionally incontinent of bladder. RN #1 confirmed she completed Section H for the quarterly MDS with the ARD of 11/11/2016, and electronically signed the MDS as complete on 11/23/2016 . During an interview on 1/12/2017 at 3:00 PM, with the MDS Coordinator/ Registered Nurse (RN) #2, it was confirmed Section H0100A was coded correctly, and section H was coded incorrectly. RN #2 stated the facility admitted Resident #1 with an indwelling catheter. A review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 02/27/2014, with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. A review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/2016, revealed the Resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/23/16, under Section H, H0400, revealed Resident #2 was coded a one (1) occasionally incontinent, instead of nine (9) not rated, because the resident had an Ostomy. This MDS under Section H, H0100 indicated Resident #2 had an Ostomy, documented by C. This Assessment revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two (2) that indicated Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. In an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #6 on 1/13/17 at 11:52 AM, it was revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with a [MEDICAL CONDITION]. During an interview on 1/13/17 at 2:40 PM, RN #1 confirmed Resident #2 should have been coded a nine (9) instead of a one (1) because Resident #2 had a [MEDICAL CONDITION]. The Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #2 on 6/4/14, with the [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. 2020-09-01