cms_HI: 2061
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
|
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
| 2061 |
KULANA MALAMA |
125057 |
91-1360 KARAYAN STREET |
EWA BEACH |
HI |
96706 |
2013-03-14 |
278 |
D |
0 |
1 |
D8QM11 |
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set accurately assessed the resident's medications for 2 of (Resident #21 and #12) 10 residents' medications reviewed in the Stage 2 sample. Findings include: 1) Record review on the afternoon of 3/13/13 was done for Resident #21. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of physician orders [REDACTED]. Review of the Medication Administration Record [REDACTED]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/22/13 was done. Under Section NO410, there was no coding for the use of the diuretic ([MEDICATION NAME] or [MEDICATION NAME]). Interview with the MDS Coordinator on 3/13/13 at 1:35 P.M. and concurrent review of the MDS acknowledged the error and the use of the diuretic ([MEDICATION NAME]) should have been coded. 2) Record review for Resident #12 found a March 2013 physician's orders [REDACTED]. Review of the quarterly MDS with ARD of 10/2/12 noted in Section N. the resident was not coded for use of diuretic. Interview and concurrent chart review with the MDS Coordinator was done on 3/13/13 at 2:10 P.M. confirmed the [MEDICATION NAME] was not coded and should have been coded as a diuretic. |
2017-06-01 |