cms_DC: 30
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 | WASHINGTON CTR FOR AGING SVCS | 95014 | 2601 18TH STREET NE | WASHINGTON | DC | 20018 | 2017-09-01 | 323 | E | 0 | 1 | BJXC11 | Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to provide supervision for eight (8) residents observed in the Activity/Dining Room unattended for approximately 12 minutes. No employee was observed in the room. Residents #47, #59, 107, 121, 212, 219, 229, and 271. The findings include: On (MONTH) 29, (YEAR), at approximately 12:30 pm, eight (8) residents were observed in the second floor Dining Room waiting to be served their lunch. There were no facility staff present in the dining room at the time of the observation. This surveyor remained in the room 10 minutes before initiating the call light. The light was initiated in response to one (1) of the residents calling out for assistance. Two (2) Certified Nursing Assistants and one Registered Nurse (RN) responded to the light in approximately three to four minutes. The residents who were observed in the room were identified as: 1. Resident #47: A review of Section G of this resident's most recent quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 02, (YEAR) revealed that the resident is coded as a four (4) Indicating that he/she is totally dependent on staff for all daily living activities. 2. Resident #59: A review of Section G of this resident's most recent quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 26, (YEAR) revealed that the resident is coded as a three (3) is able to feed self with supervision but needs extensive assistance for all other daily living activities. 3. Resident #107: A review of Section G of this resident's admission MDS dated (MONTH) 20, (YEAR) revealed that the resident is coded as a three (3) and needs extensive assistance from two persons for all daily living activities. This resident fell and sustained a fracture prior to being admitted to the facility on (MONTH) 13, (YEAR). This resident was heard calling out, I want to pee. I don't want to wet myself. 4. Resident #121: A review of Section G of this resident's most recent quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 08, (YEAR) revealed that he/she was coded as a three (3) and needed extensive assistance in mobility from one person and oversight and supervision for all other daily living activities. 5. Resident #212: A review of Section G of this resident's most recent quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 03, (YEAR) revealed that this resident is coded as a three (3) and indicated that he/she needs extensive assistance with two or more persons' physical assistance for all daily living activities. 6. Resident #219: A review of section G of this resident's latest quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 15, (YEAR) indicated that the resident was coded as a three (3) and needed extensive assistance from two (2) persons for transfer, mobility and dressing and needs supervision and oversight for eating. 7. Resident #229: A review of Section G of this resident's most recent quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 12, (YEAR) revealed that this resident needed supervision/oversight for eating and was coded as a three (3) which indicated that the need for extensive assistance for all other activities of daily living exercises. This resident also has a history of falls as documented in the MDS. 8. Resident #271: A review of Section G of this resident's most recent quarterly MDS dated (MONTH) 16, (YEAR) revealed that this resident was coded as a three (3) and needs extensive assistance from two (2) persons for bed mobility and transfer and dressing. This resident also has a history of falls as documented in the MDS. Seven (7) of the eight (8) unsupervised residents needed extensive assistance from staff for their daily needs, one resident was totally dependent and three (3) residents have a history of falls. During a face-to-face interview with Employee #19 at approximately 1:00 PM, he employee was stated that a schedule is made daily and staff is assigned throughout the day for periods of 15 minutes each. The CNA who was scheduled to monitor the room/residents between 12:30 and 12:45 PM was attending to another resident but someone should have replaced (him/her) The employee acknowledged the finding. | 2020-09-01 |