cms_WV: 9902

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
9902 EASTBROOK CENTER LLC 515089 3819 CHESTERFIELD AVENUE CHARLESTON WV 25304 2012-05-30 205 D 1 0 0XPG11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written information, to the resident or family member or legal representative, of the nursing facility's policies regarding bed-hold periods at the time of transfer. This was evident for three (3) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident identifiers: #129, #127, and #107. Facility census: 125. Findings include: a) Resident #129 Record review found Resident #129 was discharged from the facility to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Further record review found no evidence of a bed hold notice given to this resident at the time of discharge, or within the first 24 hours. b) Resident #127 Record review found that Resident #127 was discharged from the facility to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review found no evidence of a bed hold notice that was given to this resident at the time of discharge, or within the first 24 hours. c) Resident #107 Record review found that Resident #107 was discharged from the facility to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Further record review found no evidence of a bed hold notice that was given to this resident at the time of discharge, or within the first 24 hours. d) During interview with the Director of Nursing on 05/30/12 at 2:45 p.m., she stated it was not necessary to give a bed hold notice when the census was less than 90% occupancy. She said the facility was licensed for 184 residents, but had only 124 beds occupied. . 2015-08-01