cms_WV: 9592

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
9592 TEAYS VALLEY CENTER 515106 590 NORTH POPLAR FORK ROAD HURRICANE WV 25526 2011-07-14 513 D 0 1 L3JB11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed, for one (1) of forty-six (46) Stage II sample residents, to file in the resident's medical record the results of diagnostic studies (colonoscopy) completed in June 2011, to make them available for clinical management. Resident identifier: #158. Facility census: 114. Findings include: a) Resident #158 On 07/11/11 at approximately 1:00 p.m., review of the medical record for Resident #158 revealed a consultation report dated 06/15/11, stating, Scheduled for colonoscopy and removal of dome port. Scheduled for CT scan abd (abdomen/pelvis) - CBC (complete blood count), CEA (carcinoembryonic [MEDICATION NAME]), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel). The lab studies (CBC, CEA, and CMP) were performed on 06/22/11. The colonoscopy with polypectomy (medical term for the removal of a polyp) were performed on 06/29/11. As of 07/11/11, the results from the colonoscopy, as well as the results of the labs, were not part of the resident's medical record. (See also citation at F507.) On 07/11/11, Employee #62 verified these results were not on the resident's medical record. She contacted the medical records department of the local hospital, and the results were sent to the facility and made part of the medical record at that time. 2015-10-01