cms_WV: 9244
In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.
This data as json, copyable
|
rowid
|
facility_name
|
facility_id
|
address
|
city
|
state
|
zip
|
inspection_date
|
deficiency_tag
|
scope_severity
|
complaint
|
standard
|
eventid
|
inspection_text
|
filedate
|
| 9244 |
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CENTER |
515100 |
ROUTE 92, PO BOX 249 |
WHITE SULPHUR SPRING |
WV |
24986 |
2011-05-19 |
279 |
D |
0 |
1 |
UNLT11 |
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to develop care plans for two (2) of twelve (12) Stage II sampled residents to address care and services required to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs. Resident identifiers: #90 and #121. Facility census: 61. Findings include: a) Resident #90 Review of the resident's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/22/10, and her quarterly assessment with an ARD of 03/22/11, found she had experienced declines in continence. Her admission assessment indicated she was frequently incontinent of urine. The quarterly assessment was coded as always incontinent. She was also assessed as having declined from being always continent of bowel on her admission assessment to being frequently incontinent on her quarterly assessment. No care plan had been developed to address the declines in bowel and bladder continence in an attempt to restore her to prior levels of continence or to prevent further decline in these areas. -- c) Resident #121 Review of this resident's care plan found it was identified the resident had a cast on her right arm. However, it was not identified the resident's right side was her dominant side. The care plan did not identify what accommodations / adaptations needed to be implemented to assist the resident in maintaining as much independence as possible. For example, her call bell was on the floor to her right on 05/11/11. If the call bell had been on the bed, it still would have been difficult for the resident to access with her right hand. At lunch time on 05/18/11, observation found the cast on her right arm had been replaced with a splint. She continued to eat with her left hand. She was able to eat, but an adaptive device (such as a scoop plate, a plate guard, or a plate with a raised edge) would have been of benefit in making it easier for her to get food on her fork. |
2016-01-01 |