cms_WV: 9200

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
9200 EASTBROOK CENTER LLC 515089 3819 CHESTERFIELD AVENUE CHARLESTON WV 25304 2011-06-08 250 D 0 1 MZQB11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to one (1) of thirty-eight (38) Stage II sample residents who was approved for short-term placement at the facility, by failing to assess the resident's goals with respect to discharge and develop an appropriate discharge plan to accomplish those goals. Resident identifier: #148. Facility census: 144. Findings include: a) Resident #148 Medical record review revealed this [AGE] year old female was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged to home on 08/31/10. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after she suffered a fracture of the right femur. Her current active [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Further record review revealed a social work assessment and history, dated 03/29/11. The sections addressing the resident's expected length of stay, anticipated discharge potential, anticipated discharge destination, and community resources potentially needed after discharge were not completed. Review of the resident's pre-admission screening (form PAS-2000) revealed the physician expected her to be able to return home in less than three (3) months. The PAS-2000 was signed by the physician on 03/21/11. Review of her minimum data set assessment (MDS 3.0), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/01/11, found in Section Q0400 (Discharge Plan) that a determination for discharge had not been made. Employee #25 (physical therapy assistant), when interviewed on 06/02/11 at 11:05 a.m., stated he had treated the resident around this time last year and she was able to return home. He stated her son and husband had been very active in her treatment on her last admission, but he had not seen them this time around. He stated he was not sure what had happened. Employee #34 (licensed social worker), when interviewed on 06/02/11 at 10:35 a.m., stated she thought the resident was going to be a long term placement, but she was not sure. She was unable to produce any documentation of discharge plans having been discussed with the resident or her family. The social work assessment stated the resident had . 3 sons for support and to make decisions regarding her care while at (name of nursing home). 2016-01-01