cms_WV: 8692

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
8692 ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL 515113 2900 FIRST STREET HUNTINGTON WV 25702 2012-03-22 272 E 0 1 GA6A11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and procedures for pressure ulcers, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers for three (3) of twenty-one (21) stage II sample residents. The pressure ulcers were not measured or described in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures. Resident identifiers: #63, #46, and #64. Facility census: 13. Findings include: a) Resident #63 Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She remained in the facility from 09/20/11 to 10/07/11. Measurements for the wound were obtained on 09/20/11 and 09/25/11. No evidence could be found the facility had measured the wound with the exception of 09/20/11 and 09/25/11. The facility's policy and procedure manual for pressure ulcer prevention and management stated, wound assessments will be completed with descriptive documentation at every dressing change. During an interview with the clinical care manager (Employee #1), on 03/20/12, at approximately 1:57 p.m., she confirmed the wound should have been measured once a week. b) Resident #46 Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record found she had soft heels bilaterally. No evidence could be found the facility had measured the areas. The comprehensive assessments for 11/20/11 and 12/01/11 identified Resident #46 as having two (2) stage I pressure ulcers. Record review found no measurements for the areas. During an interview with Employee #1 on 03/20/12, at approximately 1:57 p.m., it was confirmed the wounds should have been measured once a week. c) Resident #64 Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the wound assessment sheet found she had a 9 x 5 centimeter red area to the sacrum. On 03/10/12, the wound was treated, but no measurements were found for this day. According to the facility's policy and procedures, wounds are to be measured once a week or at dressing changes. On 03/20/12, at approximately 1:57 p.m., Employee #1 confirmed the wound should have been measured once a week. 2016-04-01