cms_WV: 8670

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
8670 TRINITY HEALTH CARE OF MINGO 515069 100 HILLCREST DRIVE WILLIAMSON WV 25661 2012-01-11 318 D 0 1 46GB11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident with severe contractures to prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM). Resident #29 received occupational therapy (OT) services, which included passive range of motion and joint mobility, to her extremities. After she completed her treatment with OT, she was referred to restorative nursing for passive range of motion (PROM). The resident experienced was hospitalized for [REDACTED]. When she returned from the hospital, there was no evidence the resident received range of motion services or treatment for [REDACTED]. Resident identifier: #29. Facility Census: 76. Findings Include: a) Resident # 29 Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with severe joint contractures to all extremities. She was provided OT for management of these contractures. When she was discharged from therapy on 02/25/2011, she was referred to the restorative nursing program for bilateral upper extremity and lower extremity passive range of motion exercises for fifteen (15) minutes a day six (6) days a week. This resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was screened by therapy when she returned. It was determined she had an existing deficit, but there had not been a change in function. She was not treated again at that time by therapy. There was no evidence her care plan, which was established prior to her hospitalization , ensured the passive range of motion exercises were continued after she was readmitted . The restorative nursing assistant (Employee #15) was interviewed at 2:00 p.m. on 01/10/2012. Employee #15 verified she was treating this resident and providing passive range of motion to her extremities prior to the resident's hospitalization . Employee #15 stated when the resident returned from the hospital, on 04/12/2011, she did not receive an order to treat the resident; therefore, the resident was no longer receiving restorative nursing services. An interview was conducted with the occupational therapy (OT) assistant (Employee #100), at 2:30 p.m. on 01/11/2012. She verified this resident had received treatment for [REDACTED]. Employee #100 stated when the resident was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility, therapy did not pick her up. Since the resident was not picked up by therapy services, there was no order written for restorative nursing services or any therapy related services. Employee #100 was asked if the resident needed range of motion for her contractures and she stated yes. She also said the resident's contractures were severe and would not get better; however she needed range of motion and proper positioning to prevent further complications. An interview with the minimum data set (MDS) nurse (Employee #19), on 01/10/12 at 3:30 p.m., verified the resident did not have a care plan to address her positioning or range of motion needs. Employee #19 verified these services were on the resident's care plan prior to her hospitalization in April 2011. When the resident returned to the facility, on 04/12/2011, the care plan was revised, but no treatment or interventions to address the resident's contractures were incorporated into the revised care plan. Employee #19 verified there was no evidence this resident was receiving range of motion services. 2016-04-01