cms_WV: 6973

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
6973 SUNDALE NURSING HOME 515083 800 J D ANDERSON DRIVE MORGANTOWN WV 26505 2014-01-16 242 D 0 1 ONOL11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow one (1) of two (2) sample Stage 2 residents, and one (1) residents identified during random opportunities, the opportunity to make choices regarding an aspect of his/her life in the facility which was significant to each resident. These residents were not given the opportunity to choose a tub bath instead of a shower or bed bath. Resident identifiers: #38 and #98. Facility census: 87. Findings Include: a) Resident #38 On 01/14/14 at 1:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #38. During the interview the resident stated she did not know there was a bathtub in the facility, was not given an opportunity to choose a tub bath, but would love to have one. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/05/13, found Item F0400, How important is it to you to choose between a tub bath, shower or bed bath?, Resident #38's response was was coded as very important. On 01/15/14 at 4:10 p.m., an anonymous staff member stated he/she was not aware of a resident receiving a tub bath in the facility for at least two (2) years. Another anonymous staff member also stated he/she was not aware of a resident receiving a tub bath, in the facility for at least two (2) years. At 4:40 p.m., on 01/15/14, maintenance staff member, Employee #92, was asked about the whirlpool bathtub on the first floor. He stated the tub did work and was used with residents who preferred a tub bath or had a physician order [REDACTED]. He stated he did know of the tub being used for at least two (2) years. While demonstrating the whirlpool bathtub on the first floor was in working order, Employee #92 also demonstrated how to safely use the whirlpool tub to the housekeeping supervisor, (Employee #88), the laundry supervisor (Employee #18), registered nurse supervisor (Employee #67, and nursing assistant (Employee #4). During a random observation on 01/16/14 at 9:30 a.m. and 9:45 a.m., Resident #98 was interviewed concerning their preference for a bath. Resident #98 stated they would like to take a tub bath, but the facility had not offered them the opportunity. The facility administrator was asked, on 01/16/14 at 10:30 a.m., to present any information that would reveal Resident #38 had been offered an opportunity for a tub bath. No evidence was presented concerning Resident #38. 2017-09-01