cms_WV: 6309

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
6309 MARMET CENTER 515146 ONE SUTPHIN DRIVE MARMET WV 25315 2015-04-28 241 D 1 0 J5M711 Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an environment and promote care to maintain or enhance the dignity and respect for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed and for one (1) resident found during a random opportunity for observation. For Resident #72, the facility failed to ensure staff spoke to her in a respectful manner. For Resident #46, the facility failed to keep a urinary catheter bag covered. Resident identifiers: #72 and #46. Facility census: 86. Findings include: a) Resident #72 On 04/22/15 at 1:00 p.m., review of the grievance/concern forms found Resident #72 filed a grievance with the facility's social worker (SW) on 03/04/15. Documentation on the grievance/concern included, . She also has concerns about staff - she says they have been talking behind her back-yelling @ (at) her because she comes to the desk to get her cigarettes early and taking up space. She alleges that the staff complain about taking her outside because she is so heavy - they don't want to push her. At 4:15 p.m. on 04/22/15, the SW confirmed she could not provide verification the resident's concerns on 03/04/15 were investigated. At 4:45 p.m. on 04/22/15, Resident #72 was asked if staff treated her with dignity and respect. She replied, No, they talk about me. She reported staff talked about her behind her back. Further review of the medical record found a nursing note, dated 02/13/15 at 6:58 p.m., which indicated the resident stated staff were making rude remarks to her. These remarks were supposedly made on the resident's night of admission, 02/12/15. There was no evidence the facility explored what rude comments were made. On 04/27/15 at 10:00 a.m., the administrator confirmed the concerns voiced by the resident on 02/13/15 were not investigated at that time. He stated they were investigated on 04/23/15, and provided copies of the investigation. The investigation was not conducted until the situation was brought to the attention of the facility during the survey. Information provided by the administrator included an interview with the resident, on 04/23/14, regarding the allegations of rude remarks made to the resident on her first night at the facility, 02/12/15. The interview with the resident revealed Employee #19 made the statement, We are going to have to cath. (catheterize) you. We can't come back in here every 15 minutes. On 04/23/15, the administrator spoke to the nursing assistant (NA) #19, who provided care to the resident on 02/12/14. A statement obtained from Employee #19 found, I did not say that to be mean about it. It was a concern about her . Further review of the investigation found Employee #19 received verbal counseling on 04/23/15 regarding her remarks to Resident #79. According to information in the investigation, the employee who supposedly made the comments to Resident #72 about her being too heavy to push outside to smoke no longer worked at the facility. The employee's statement could not be obtained. b) Resident #46 Resident #46 was observed, on 04/22/15 at 11:10 a.m., during the initial tour of the facility. The resident was resting in bed. Observation revealed the resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was not covered and was visible from the hallway . Review of the resident's care plan was conducted on 04/22/15 at 12:10 p.m. The care plan stated the resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was to be covered at all times. Interview with Employee #52, a registered nurse (RN), was conducted at 11:12 a.m. on 04/22/15. During that interview, Employee #52 agreed the catheter bag was not covered, was visible from the hallway, and should be covered. The RN was unable to locate a catheter bag cover in the resident's room. 2018-04-01