cms_WV: 5937

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
5937 ELKINS REGIONAL CONVALESCENT CENTER 515025 1175 BEVERLY PIKE ELKINS WV 26241 2015-01-07 242 D 0 1 RDRC11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident interview, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a treatment schedule significant to a resident was honored for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for choices. The facility failed to offer Resident #20 her bone stimulator on the time schedule requested by the resident. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 104. Findings include: a) Resident #20 During a Stage 1 interview on 12/30/14 at 11:14 a.m., Resident #20 related she had fractured her left arm and was receiving rehabilitation services. physician's orders [REDACTED]. It was scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Review of electronic Medication Administration Record [REDACTED]. On 09/13/14 at 3:16 a.m., the bone stimulator was offered. This note related the resident told staff she wanted it at 8:00 p.m. A Stage 2 interview was conducted with the resident on 12/31/14 at 11:14 a.m. Upon inquiry, the resident said she had complained and complained about the times the treatment was offered, but staff did not listen to her. Although the resident informed staff she wanted the treatment at 8:00 p.m., and the order was for 7:30 p.m., staff continued to offer the treatment at times which were not satisfactory to the resident: -- 10/01/14 at 3:19 a.m. -- 10/02/14 at 11:25 p.m. -- 10/11/14 at 10:57 p.m. -- 10/13/14 at 10:46 p.m. -- 10/2514 at 11:16 p.m. -- The e-mars dated 11/02/14, 11/21/14, 11/22/14, 11/27/14, 11/28/14, and 11/31/14 noted the treatment was not administered because the resident was sleeping. -- On 12/08/14 at 22:45 p.m., the e-mar note indicated the resident said, If not done before 9:00 p.m., it couldn't be done. Although the resident informed staff she would not accept the treatment if it was not done before 9:00 p.m., staff continued to offer the treatment at times which the resident said were too late: -- 12/10/14 at 9:58 p.m. -- 12/11/04 at 9:45 p.m. -- 12/13/04 at 10:21 p.m. -- 12/16/04 at 11:30 p.m. -- 12/18/04 at 10:29 p.m. -- 12/24/04 at 10:45 p.m. -- 12/25/04 at 11:07 p.m. According to the e-mar notes, staff continuously offered the treatment at times which the resident considered too late. An e-mar note, dated 12/09/14, indicated the bone stimulator was offered at 9:30 p.m. The resident refused the treatment, stating she needed it done no later than 9:00 p.m. An interview with the director of nursing (DON), on 12/31/14 at 12:12 p.m., revealed she was aware the resident continued often refused her treatment. The DON said, It is being offered earlier. The DON reviewed Resident #20's medication administration records, then confirmed times offered were still outside the parameters considered satisfactory to the resident. 2018-05-01