cms_WV: 11060
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11060 | VALLEY CENTER | 515169 | 1000 LINCOLN DRIVE | SOUTH CHARLESTON | WV | 25309 | 2009-06-25 | 492 | D | 0 | 1 | OJEL11 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Part I -- Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide information regarding Hospice to one (1) resident from a total sample of twenty-five (25), who recently received orders for "comfort measures only". This is required by W.V.C. 16-5C-20. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 128. Findings include: a) Resident #4 Medical record review, on 06/24/09, revealed this resident's Physician order [REDACTED]. Further review revealed no evidence the resident and family had been provided information regarding Hospice. Interview with the social worker, on the morning of 06/24/09, verified this information had not been provided as required. --- Part II -- Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to provide one (1) of three (3) certified nursing assistants, hired in 2009, with a copy of the Nurse Aide Abuse Registry legislative rule, as required by WV Legislative Rule 69-8.1. Employee identifier: #75. Facility census: 128. Findings include: a) Employee #75 A review of the personnel file of Employee #75, a nursing assistant who was hired on 06/08/09, failed to reveal any evidence that the facility had provided this employee with a copy of the Nurse Aide Abuse Registry legislative rule, as required by WV Legislative Rule 69-8.1. During an interview with the administrator at 10:45 a.m. on 06/25/09, he explained the person in charge of employee records had recently resigned unexpectedly, and he acknowledged he could not find any evidence to show this employee had received the required information. . | 2014-09-01 |