cms_WV: 10335
Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette
rowid | facility_name | facility_id | address | city | state | zip | inspection_date | deficiency_tag | scope_severity | complaint | standard | eventid | inspection_text | filedate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10335 | CEDAR RIDGE CENTER | 515087 | 302 CEDAR RIDGE ROAD | SISSONVILLE | WV | 25320 | 2011-03-18 | 205 | D | 1 | 1 | I28Y12 | **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide to the resident (and a family member or legal representative) a written notice which specified the duration of the facility's bed-hold policy when one (1) of sixteen (16) sample residents was transferred to the hospital due to urgent medical needs. Resident identifier: #102. Facility census: 116. Findings include: a) Resident #102 Medical record review, on 03/16/11, revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 03/14/11, the resident was transferred to the hospital due to an acute change in condition. The medical record contained no evidence the resident was provided a written notice which specified the duration of the facility's bed-hold policy. At 1:45 p.m. on 03/16/11, an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON - Employee #45). When asked for evidence the required information was provided to the resident and a family member or legal representative, the DON stated the information was included in a packet of information which the facility sent to the hospital with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) upon transfer. Further interview revealed the facility was unable to provide evidence this information was sent with the resident; and there was no evidence a family member or legal representative was also provided the written bed-hold policy when Resident #102 was transferred to the hospital. In addition, the facility had no means of assuring the resident and a family member or legal representative got this information, since it was included in a packet of medical information intended for the hospital. On 03/17/11 at 9:00 a.m., a discussion was held with the facility's administrator (ADM - Employee #10), regarding the provision of a written bed-hold policy to the resident and a family member or legal representative upon transfer to the hospital. At that time, the ADM confirmed the facility had not been providing the information to a family member or legal representative, and confirmed he was unable to provide evidence the information was sent with the resident at the time of transfer. The ADM also confirmed the information was not actually provided to the resident; therefore, there was no assurance the resident received the information, from the packet sent to the receiving hospital. . | 2015-05-01 |