cms_WV: 10192

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid	facility_name	facility_id	address	city	state	zip	inspection_date	deficiency_tag	scope_severity	complaint	standard	eventid	inspection_text	filedate
10192	WILLOW TREE MANOR	515156	1263 SOUTH GEORGE STREET	CHARLES TOWN	WV	25414	2010-01-28	156	D	0	1	MFK411	Based on record review, review of the denial notice letters, and staff interview, the facility failed to include the identification of the service being denied and/or the reason for the denial in the letter provided by the facility to the resident and/or responsible party, informing them of services not covered under Medicare for one (1) or eighteen (18) sampled and two (2) of three (3) random residents whose Medicare notification letters were reviewed; and/or failed to inform the responsibility party of rights related to the formulation of advance directives for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents. Resident identifiers: #29, #41, #34, and #53. Facility census: 100. Findings include: a) Resident #29 A review of the medical record revealed that, upon admission to the nursing home on 06/02/08, Resident #29 had been determined by a physician to have the capacity to make healthcare decisions, and Resident #29 expressed a desire for a "Do Not Resuscitate" (DNR) order. Since this admission, he lost the capacity to make his own healthcare decision. As of 12/30/08, his physician appointed a health care surrogate (HCS) to make these decisions on his behalf, in accordance with his known wishes as required by State law. Further review, however, found no evidence to reflect the facility fully informed the HCS of the resident's DNR decision. During an interview with the social worker at 1:45 p.m. on 01/27/10, she acknowledged she had not discussed the resident's code status with the HCS, but she stated she would do this as soon as possible. b) Residents #41, #34, and #53 A review of the Medicare denial letters for the aforementioned residents revealed the facility failed to indicate which skilled service was being discontinued and the reason(s) for this non-coverage. When this was discussed with the administrator at 9:30 a.m. on 01/27/10, he agreed this information was not present. A follow-up interview with a nurse (Employee #27) confirmed this information was not being included in the denial notices at present, as she was not aware it was required. .	2015-06-01