cms_GA: 10460

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
10460 CROSSVIEW CARE CENTER 115541 402 E. BAY ST PINEVIEW GA 31071 2009-04-16 314 D 1 0 XCY211 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility had failed to provide the appropriate care for one resident with a pressure sore, Resident #3, from a sample of four residents: Findings include: According to the medical record Resident #3 had a history of [REDACTED]. According to the wound care clinic note of 12/16/08, it was documented that the right heel ulcer had healed in June of 2008. The resident had an order in place, at least since 9/08 and prior to 12/3/08, for [MEDICATION NAME] border to the right heel every three days and to pull the dressing back daily and check the status of the heel. Review of the documentation on the treatment record for 12/3/08 revealed a notation that the right heel had re-opened. The facility continued to use [MEDICATION NAME] and dry dressing every three days without notifying the physician that the right heel had re-opened. There was no documentation found with a description of the newly opened area, in regards to the size or stage of the open area on the right heel, on 12/3/08. Also, there was no documented evidence that the dressing was pulled back over the heel and monitored daily as ordered. There was no documented evidence that the physician was notified until 6 days later of the open area on the right heel, on 12/9/08, at which time it was described as an open area (no stage), 5 centimeter (cm.) by 1 cm. with large amounts of brown drainage with a very foul odor. The physician ordered a wound culture on that date. The culture showed a heavy growth of Escherichia coli and [MEDICATION NAME] faecalis. Interview with licensed administrative staff "AA" on 4/16/09 at 3:00 p.m. revealed that he/she stated that the physician should have been notified on 12/3/08 when the right heel area had re-opened. 2014-07-01