cms_GA: 10005

In collaboration with The Seattle Times, Big Local News is providing full-text nursing home deficiencies from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These files contain the full narrative details of each nursing home deficiency cited regulators. The files include deficiencies from Standard Surveys (routine inspections) and from Complaint Surveys. Complete data begins January 2011 (although some earlier inspections do show up). Individual states are provides as CSV files. A very large (4.5GB) national file is also provided as a zipped archive. New data will be updated on a monthly basis. For additional documentation, please see the README.

Data source: Big Local News · About: big-local-datasette

This data as json, copyable

rowid facility_name facility_id address city state zip inspection_date deficiency_tag scope_severity complaint standard eventid inspection_text filedate
10005 LUMBER CITY NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER 115404 93 HIGHWAY 19 LUMBER CITY GA 31549 2010-05-27 387 D 0 1 NSXF11 **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician alternated visits with the nurse practitioner for two residents (#2 and #11), and visited one resident (#12) every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission in a total sample of 16 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. On 8/26/09, 9/23/09, 10/23/09, 11/11/09 and 12/16/09, the resident was visited by the nurse practitioner. Although the physician co-signed the nurse practitioner's progress notes, there was no indication that the physician alternated visits with the nurse practitioner. 2. Residents #11 was admitted on [DATE]. On 9/23/09, 10/23/09, 11/11/09, and 12/16/09, the resident was visited by the nurse practitioner. Although the physician co-signed the nurse practitioner's progress notes, there was no indication that the physician alternated visits with the nurse practitioner. 3. Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. On 3/17/10, the resident was seen by the physician. However, on 4/21/10 and 5/19/10, the resident was seen by the nurse practitioner. the attending physician did not visit the resident once every 30 days for the first 90 days after his/her admission to the facility. In an interview on 5/26/10 at 2:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing said that the physician and nurse practitioner came to the facility together, and that the nurse practitioner saw some residents while the physician saw other residents. The physician signed his notes and co-signed the nurse practitioner's notes. 2015-03-01